Protect the Lambourn

This forum belongs to the other rivers.
Rob2cv

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Rob2cv »

Thank you to all those who have already signed.
Firebird wrote: Is this project different to the treated sewage discharges that take place in many rivers? Does the Lambourn have any others. I imagine this would raise the phosphate levels, and I think the Lambourn was relatively low in those compared to some rivers.
As far as I understand the issue, planning permission for the development was granted with the agreement that the sewage from the new houses would be pumped to the local water authority treatment works and then discharged, I believe, into the Kennet. The developers now intend to overide this constraint and use a (cheaper!) passive treatment system and discharge directly into the Lambourn instead.

The local water authority treatment works are monitored and regulated by legislation. What constraints would there be on a private, stand alone treatment plant? Who would be responsible for the upkeep of the plant after the developers have taken their initial profit? These are some of the questions which need to be answered.

It is the fact that this is to be done without any prior public consultation that is the most worrying to me. This could set a dangerous precedent that may affect any river in the future.

Keep signing the petition!

Rob

User avatar
Isis
Perch
Posts: 492
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:17 pm
11
Location: Bribie Island Queensland

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Isis »

Already signed. This is an absolutely wonderful little river. Lived in Eastbury for a couple of years and the river ran through the village. Used to pop downstream a couple of miles and fish for the brownies. Happy days.

User avatar
Rutland Rod
Arctic Char
Posts: 1924
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:50 am
11
Location: Rutland

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Rutland Rod »

Just signed
Dave

User avatar
Gal
Ruffe
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:51 pm
9
Location: Essex

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Gal »

Signed

User avatar
Chubman
Crucian Carp
Posts: 964
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:14 pm
12
Location: Eastleigh, Hampshire

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Chubman »

just signed, how dare they even think of getting away with it.

User avatar
Wallyboy Rob
Chub
Posts: 1127
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 10:30 pm
9
Location: On the Wally as often as possible ( Portsmouth area)

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Wallyboy Rob »

Signed
going with the flow - You gotta luv them gonks

"There's no way you're going to get a quote from us to use on your book cover" Metropolitan Police spokesperson
from the back cover of Wall and piece - Banksy

Rob2cv

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Rob2cv »

Good news for all those who signed the recent petition to stop effluent discharge into the Lambourn...

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/news/home ... -over.html


Rob

User avatar
Stathamender
Tench
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 5:56 pm
10
Location: Sheffield and Nice (France)

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Stathamender »

So, according to the NWN, the LPA (in this case WBC) has, despite the EA and in response to the CEO of the AT, demanded (presumably PDQ) an EIA for an SSSI and SAC. I C. YMMV.
Iain

What is your favourite word?
I suspect it could be “love”, despite its drawbacks in the rhyming department.
Björn Ulvaeus

User avatar
Fisherman1947
Dace
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:00 am
10
Location: East London

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Fisherman1947 »

Signed.
Petitions never get you anywhere the best thing to do is stop buying the fishing license for a year or two hit them in their pockets.
Old fishermen never die they only smell that way.

User avatar
Olly
Wild Carp
Posts: 9176
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:58 pm
11
Location: Hants/Surrey/Berks borders.

Re: Protect the Lambourn

Post by Olly »

They may be able then, through fines for not having a licence, to take positive action?

Post Reply

Return to “Other Rivers”